BPNL-005
Positioning statement development v1.0
Complexity
2 | Standard
time estimate
45-60 minutes
status
Active
entry point
Build
LOIS BENCHMARK
When to Use
Developing positioning statements with built-in quality validation.
Tags
The Prompt
NOTE:
Select and copy the prompt in full or click the “copy prompt to clipboard” button. Paste the prompt into a Notepad or Google Doc and edit before submitting.
I need to develop a positioning statement for [CLIENT].
**Inputs:**
– Survey analysis: [Reference or key findings]
– Interview analysis: [Reference or key findings]
– Competitive context: [Key competitors and their positioning]
– Strategic priorities: [What leadership wants to emphasize]
—
**POSITIONING STATEMENT FRAMEWORK**
**Draft positioning statement:**
For [target audience],
[CLIENT] is the [category/frame of reference]
that [key benefit/promise]
because [reasons to believe/proof points].
Unlike [alternatives/competitors],
[CLIENT] [key differentiator].
—
**OPTION DEVELOPMENT**
**Option A: [Descriptive name]**
[Full positioning statement]
**Option B: [Descriptive name]**
[Full positioning statement]
**Option C: [Descriptive name]**
[Full positioning statement]
—
**5-TEST VALIDATION**
Test each option against:
| Test | Question | Option A | Option B | Option C |
|——|———-|———-|———-|———-|
| **Distinctive** | Does it differentiate from competitors? | ☐ Pass / ☐ Fail | | |
| **Credible** | Can [CLIENT] deliver on this promise? | ☐ Pass / ☐ Fail | | |
| **Relevant** | Does the audience care? | ☐ Pass / ☐ Fail | | |
| **Sustainable** | Can this position be held long-term? | ☐ Pass / ☐ Fail | | |
| **Actionable** | Can this guide decisions and content? | ☐ Pass / ☐ Fail | | |
—
**VALIDATION NOTES**
**Option A:**
– Strengths: [What works]
– Concerns: [What doesn’t]
– Adjustments needed: [If any]
[Repeat for each option]
—
**RECOMMENDATION**
**Preferred option:** [A/B/C]
**Rationale:** [Why this option best serves [CLIENT]]
**Refinements suggested:** [Any tweaks to strengthen]
**Questions for client discussion:**
– [Strategic choice embedded in this positioning]
– [Tradeoff to acknowledge]